Category Archives: Training

My pedagogical stance

General and language learning theory, my own preferences as a learner, and my experiences as a learner and teacher all influence my beliefs about the nature of learning and teaching.

I regard interactivity in classrooms as crucial because, through engagement of learners together in focused activities, I have witnessed, read evidence of, and experienced greater learner interest and improved retention. Besides, if learners are passive recipients, it is difficult to see how they are going to develop domain-specific, generic, cognitive or linguistic skills.

Fortunately, social constructivism currently enjoys considerable favour in educational circles, and this encourages teachers to plan for active, collaborative learning. Outcomes-based education generally promotes a constructivist view of learning and results in more student-centredness. Moreover, in the language learning arena, the popularity of the communicative approach also results in an emphasis on student-student interaction.

Another advantage of an interactive, student-centred approach is that teachers have more freedom to monitor and listen to learners. This can have benefits in terms of informing the teacher about the progress of learners and their mood, and whether divergences from lesson plans are required.

Saying this, I still think that direct instruction has its place as an efficient means to convey information to large groups when self-aware learners are armed with effective learning strategies and can adjust to didactic teaching in order to internalise content knowledge. Behaviourism too offers a partial explanation of learning. Repetitive practice has its place, particularly with the development of psychomotor skills. Repetitive learning can involve understanding as well as habit formation, for example in the learning of Chinese characters and drills in language learning are beneficial for pronunciation.

As a teacher and trainer, I am conscious of my own learning style, but careful not to impose it on others. To accommodate a group of learners’ preferences, I initially adopted a balanced activities approach, i.e. varying the means and modes of instruction over time to satisfy some learners some of the time. Nowadays, I am able to employ a range of differentiation strategies which is more efficient. It is also my practice to conduct learner training so that students can eventually differentiate for themselves.

With regard to establishing a positive environment with and between learners, I conduct activities designed for this purpose. I also endeavour to act unaffectedly, manage behaviour in a consistent and fair manner, and observe learner reactions carefully.

During initial training, I believe that new teachers need to be exposed to the theory and research findings underpinning the pedagogical guidance that they receive, and to be invited to question that guidance by reflecting on personal learning experiences.

However, clear direction at this stage is, I consider, warranted. In my experience, teachers starting out on their careers look for straightforward recommendations from trainers on how to teach. Lesson frameworks and an assortment of immediately applicable teaching techniques constitute a ‘survival kit’ to meet their short-term needs as educators. They also need opportunities to develop the micro-skills of classroom management, e.g., giving clear instructions. Without these skills, teaching can be inefficient, disorganised and they may lose student confidence.

I also think that lesson observations, teaching journals and reflective assignments can help to circumvent any propensity towards prescriptivism in their teaching. For example, situated discussion following lesson observations in which the observer carefully evaluates the success of the teaching by reference to achievement of intended learning outcomes rather than strict adherence to a teaching recipe. This, I believe, can help new teachers to become more reflective and flexible classroom practitioners and to pay more attention to the learners rather than their own teaching performances. In the longer term, or for more experienced teachers, I believe it is advantageous if they are supported to continue their professional development through additional workshops to increase their methodological options, and through their own educational enquiries via, e.g., action research projects.

Are teacher development workshops worthwhile?

While the value of lectures has received considerable attention, the merits of in-service workshops are less frequently examined. In this short post, I identify the limitations of workshops as well as what I believe a well-designed workshop can hope to achieve. From the start, I want to make clear my position that workshop providers tend to be overly optimistic about potential outcomes.

Before evaluating the virtues of workshops though, I will describe their characteristics.

What is a staff development workshop? The use of an industrial metaphor must have become so prevalent that it resulted in a separate dictionary entry: “A workshop is a period of discussion or practical work on a particular subject in which a group of people share their knowledge or experience.” (Collins COBUILD Advanced English Dictionary)

I would underline that not just opinions but also reasons should be exchanged. If views are given without justifications, the value of the experience is doubtful.

Admittedly, there is great variety in workshop design but, whatever form workshops take, they tend to share several characteristics:

  • Introduction to key concepts and latest findings from research
  • A greater degree of interaction than lectures
  • Focused small group tasks
  • Plenary discussion and summing up
  • Collection of evaluations

Sometimes, events advertised as workshops turn out to be disguised lectures. The person conducting the session offers little opportunity for participants to discuss, or to carry out joint tasks on, the topic in question. Peer interaction is an essential feature of workshops and this interaction needs to be properly focused. Just asking participants to talk about a topic leads to people going off at tangents, in my experience. Thus, the interaction needs to take the form of small group tasks that have outcomes of direct relevance to the intended workshop outcomes.

The good intentions in making workshops available are, I believe, that by attending them academic teaching staff will

  1. be able to remain current in their knowledge of learning & teaching matters
  2. have a platform to discuss pertinent pedagogic matters with peers
  3. find inspiration for the enhancement of learning-teaching, assessment and curriculum design, and
  4. gain new strategies for experimentation in their respective learning-teaching contexts.

There is a problem with 1) above for the workshop designer. How to select the level of input complexity when the participants background knowledge is likely to be varied and often cannot be discovered prior to the event? This is not like teaching a regular class where the instructor really gets to know the learners and can estimate the appropriate challenge for them. It is not practical to differentiate the content if a conventional workshop format is retained.

2) and 3) above are achievable but 4) is not. In my workshop designs I do not include learning outcomes that predict that workshop participants will gain fresh strategies. This is because those strategies need to be tried out on multiple occasions, adjusted and refined before they can be said to part of a teacher’s repertoire.

Workshops are a ubiquitous feature of in-service development. At every educational institution that I have known, a programme of staff development sessions was made available on a range of educational topics. Providers of workshops included education authorities, learning & teaching centres, invited external experts, etc. Attendance at these events was recorded and credited by the institutions as evidence of ongoing development. However, they were not sufficient in themselves to provide evidence of development in practice, just development of conceptions about practice.